Flag burning amendment fails in the senate

In another mid term election stunt, the Republicans neo-conservatives have again intorduced more wedge legislation. This of course was expected, but is disappointing nevertheless. Several days in the legislative session were wasted in this debate, as was the case the last time the amendment was introduced, which was, not coincidentally, another election year.

Like the anti-Gay Marriage amendment, this is meant to be a distraction. I personally have never in my life seen anyone burn an American flag. This is probably due to the fact that their life expectancy would be reduced considerably by those nearby. I don't recall being stuck in traffic because of all the people running out to buy lighter fluid and flags. In fact, I don't think I've even seen anyone burn a US flag inside this country, even on the news. So what exactly is the problem?

The problem is more style over substance. It's an effort to elevate the symbol of freedom above freedom itself. The trouble is, there are many symbols out there that are very important to people. Like the flag, they represent many of our core ideals. If we outlaw the burning of the flag on the grounds that it's disrespectful, why stop there? Why not outlaw burning pictures of a flag. Why not outlaw speaking out against the flag? If someone cussed the flag out publicly, isn't that tantamount to burning it? And what about those other symbols, like the Bible, or the Koran, or my Voter's registration card? Those should be protected as well, right?

What is the point of freedom if you're only free to say and do things that the government doesn't find offensive?